Superheroes are huge , not just in strip but in pic and novels as well . So there ’s nothing more exciting than the musical theme of create a fresh superhero from scratch . But are n’t all the good idea taken ? Not necessarily .
We asked some of the sharpest intellect in the existence of superheroes , and they shared some ideas with us . Here are some certain - fire confidential information on creating a raw superhero or supervillain — without rip off an existing character reference .
desire to avoid using a name that ’s been used before ? you may always apply Google , articulate Gerard Jones , author of Men of Tomorrow : Geeks , Gangsters and the Birth of the Comic Book . Like , you could search for “ Nega - Boy”+superhero . And then possibly double - check with “ Nega - Boy”+comics . say Jones , “ It would take some scrolling , but I think if another published comics champion had the same name it would occur up sanely quickly . Also , remember that it ’s moderately dependable to use an earlier character ’s name unless it ’s an extant trademark or presently in photographic print . ”
If you ’re create a character for a big comics publisher , then the fellowship will do a “ name hunt , which is some orphic outgrowth by which they get hold out whether a name is already in current ownership , ” says Gail Simone , author of Birds of Prey , Secret Six and Lord of Welcome to serenity . So you may not get your first choice ( or your third , for that matter ) for a role name .
But it ’s almost impossible to be sure , caution Kurt Busiek , Jehovah of Kurt Busiek ’s Astro City and author of Avengers and many other titles :
I have a very good memory , but even so , I from time to time twine up using a name that ’s been used before — ASTRO CITY has a 1940s hero foretell the Lamplighter , and there ’s an old Green Lantern villain of that name . But it ’s not necessary to avoid every individual name that ’s ever been used anywhere , really . Nobody ’s going to care that there was a minor fictitious character back in the sixties with the same name as a minor ASTRO CITY fiber , any more than they like that there are two King Kulls , or numerous Sandmans , or like that .
Plus , of course , even if I managed to be thoroughgoing about make new name , it would n’t stop duplications — I make a Confessor and a Street Angel in ASTRO CITY , and afterward , Marvel introduced their own Confessor and there was an indie volume telephone STREET ANGEL . So it goes .
Austin Grossman , the author of shortly , I Will Be unbeatable , is even more fatalistic about your chances of creating a superhero name that nobody else has come up with or will come up with :
There ’s no superhero name that ’s so incredibly witty it has n’t been done before . I do n’t bother match – if I do , and start to see everything that ’s been test and thought of , I sense too hemmed in even to think , and my whole idea for the character starts to get contort and lose . I guess the last prison term I did that was with Mirror Master , and there have already been three of those at least . I just accept that someone has already thought of it – I do n’t think that part of it count – and just sample to draw the character as vividly as I maybe can .
The most important thing , says Busiek , is to derive up with a name that fits your graphic symbol :
Mostly , I just attempt to get up with good , memorable names that fathom like the right sort of name for whatever sentence period the graphic symbol I ’m make came from . The All - American is a XL character , Leopardman is a belated 50s fibre , the Experimentals are late 60s … they need to ring true for the time period .
“ It ’s just a interrogation of having an ear for it , ” say Simone . “ J.R.R. Tolkein may be the ultimate illustration of a guy cable who could say book with just a fibre ’s name . ”
How do you come in up with an origin account for your hero that has n’t been done a billion times ?
Jones says that explore to see if someone ’s done your origin story before is gruelling than with names .
I have no melodic theme how you could research that , unless there ’s some very specific detail . Like origin+superhero+ferret+refrigerator . But then of class you ’d drop the earlier character whose source involve a weasel and a icebox , or a ferret and a dishwasher , and multitude would say you plainly ripped it off . [ But probability are ] , there will never be any more original inception . It ’s all about what you do with it . Keeping it really simple is in all likelihood best , so you do n’t bet like you ’re give way for originality and failing .
The main affair , says Busiek , is to come up with a unparalleled character — so even if the canonical origin has been done before , it still has n’t been done before in that way . Busiek explains :
My role Quarrel became a superhero because her dada was a first-rate - villain and she wanted to bring honor back to the name , to erase the disgrace she feels over what her begetter did . If I line up out that ’s been done before , I wo n’t vex about it . I ’m positive that whatever fictitious character it ’d have been done for is n’t the same character as Quarrel , so it ’s not an issue .
What matters is n’t whether it ’s a never - before - used idea . What count is what you do with it . Samaritan ’s origin — that he was sent back in time from a bloodcurdling futurity to prevent that time to come from ever come about , gaining powers along the way — is , at least loosely , the same estimate as the Terminator movies . Without the superpowers and with more killer robots , at least . But we did very different thing with a similar theme , so who worry ? the great unwashed have been desire retaliation against those who betrayed them long before and long after THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO , and grinder have escape from jail and adopted a phoney persona to get that revenge , but if you do it well , it ’s still going to work .
As Simone puts it , the full point of the origin chronicle is n’t really to explain how the hero have his / her powers , it ’s to excuse “ what they most desire , what they most fear . The good origins , like Spider - gentleman ’s , Batman ’s , and the like , encapsulate the character ’s grounds to survive . The worst merely explicate that a drum of radioactive waste fell on their head and now they can fly . ”
So what really actuate your Hero of Alexandria to put on a costume and fight back iniquity ? ( Or your villain , to put on a costume and be malevolent ? ) Is it really possible to come up with an original motivation for superheroics or supervillainy ?
Busiek says that more than hail up with an original motivation , what matters is that your character has a strong need :
Human drives and emotion and motivating run in some pretty basic patterns , but get dressed up in unique manner . But at kernel , the solid need are going to be uncomplicated ones , and you ’re going to see them over and over . That state , I ’m never ready to believe that there ’s nothing new under the Sunday . Someone can fare up with something that ’s never been done before , perchance , but what ’ll matter is whether it ’s undecomposed , not whether it ’s unique .
Grossman says you should mystify to the fundamentals :
I do n’t need to win the “ what wacky Modern office can I think of ” competition . I remember the moment for me was Chairface , in The Tick – I think that was hilarious , but for some reasonableness it ’s the last novelty superpower I need to see . I like the classic might – flight of steps , speed , impregnability , telepathy , all that stuff – I like to explore how they cross with personality and bodies and the existent world , it ’s as rich a subject as I need to have – I do n’t mean a new power is going to help me find more than that .
How do you avoid just creating a clone of Superman ? Given that so many other classical superheroes were created to copy Superman , what can you do to check that you ’re not sticking too closely to the formula of the invulnerable fly strong guy wire ?
Simone say it ’s a thing of going off the tucker out path :
So much of the persona writing that ’s out there is based not on humanity , but on second- and third - script adaptation of stuff that ’s already proven and popular . There are lashings of characters that are essentially wanderer - human being or Batman or Wolverine . I would much rather create a superhero or villain that , say , has a operative addiction or a inadequate - term computer memory retention problem . Something we have n’t learn yet . Character , to me , is the search for humanity , and I ’m always vastly more concerned in desperate character than whatever the zeitgeist has resolve is nerveless and pelvic girdle that week . It ’s a matter of something that affects a modest interview more deeply , perhaps , than the aggregate - appeal poppycock that is often more forgettable .
As with other things , Grossman is a tad fatalist :
There is no superhero that is not in some way derivative of Superman — that ship has just sailed . world power , origin , forget it – we ’re all doing variations on a root word , and there ’s nothing wrong with that . And if someone ’s going to start suing people , they ’re break to commence by picking on somebody a lot richer than I am .
Kieron Gillen , author of Thor and Uncanny X - humanity , basically fit :
The question of what is or is n’t originality is enormous . In the last thirty years or so , some of the most interesting superhero work has n’t been with characters whose originality is the dot — but what they allow you to say about existing character reference , the pilot they ’ve create and the genre they exist inside . I mean , for my money , the majority of the best ten Superman stories ever told do n’t actually feature the bona fide Superman . In other actor’s line , “ unoriginality ” can perfectly be part of the stop of a fiber .
But Busiek is a minute more affirmative :
It ’s not like you ’re kick the bucket to accidentally cook up someone who come from a blown - up planet who has mighty powers under Earth ’s sun . If you do that , you ’ll know what you ’re doing . So do n’t do that .
I ’ve created character alike to Superman — but for all that people see similarity in , say , Samaritan , if you look at the quality , he ’s not from outer space , he does n’t have powers due to his biology , he was n’t raised by charitable little - township role models , and so on . Other than the fact that he ’s strong , degraded , flies , has a cape and is grand as inferno , he ’s for the most part different from Superman . dissimilar history , origin , powers , mission and more . And those similarities are pretty dim-witted , nothing anyone can really object to .
Sometimes , you want a fussy variety of character , so you ’re go to be build off a intimate archetype . If you do that , ensure that if you ’ve got a alike canonical idea , everything else is different . Or if you pop with a solidifying of powers or a potent motivation or whatever , do n’t build the character along the same melodic line as other characters who has that same kind of power , or same motivation . Go in a different direction .
And make up a deal of graphic symbol . practice session helps .
Do n’t need yourself — has this been done before ? Ask yourself what unequaled matter you could fetch to it . What can you put into this persona that hoi polloi have n’t realize before — like something from your own experience or imagnation ?
Sean McKeever , creator of The Waiting Place and Gravity , and author of Teen Titans and many other titles , gives a great example :
When Mike Norton and I created Gravity for Marvel , I wo n’t guess for a second like we were n’t doing our own take on the 80s , college - aged Spidey we both grew up with . That was n’t around anymore and we wanted to make those kinds of account for today .
What I did , though , was tap into my own experience of being a Midwesterner , and my many coppice with disillusionment in my college years , and tossed those qualities into the mixture , along with my lovemaking of cosmic - style descent story ( which we ’ve never had the probability to fully explicate , but hopefully someday ) . That gave it a fun aw - shucks - cape and enough of a spin to feel novel to us while still make up homage , and hopefully that came across to the reading populace .
The bottom line is , you really want to do something that ’s exciting and thrilling , and not just the same previous stuff . Here ’s how Simone couch it :
I find like writing is like kayaking down a river with many creeks and tributary . When you ’re in that office , there ’s almost always a clear , safe path , a route that your mind automatically gravitates towards . It ’s the path that most writers automatically stick unto , as it were . And a lot of fable carry that path at every fork in the river … flick that do the expected , novels that never surprise .
But that path is always the least interesting , to me . It always seems that the little freakish and neglect paths are the way to go , even if you sometimes finish up hitting a dead end or sail over a cliff to the rocks below . When I experience that obvious path coming up , I break and wait for other options .
I think the resolution to all these questions [ about create characters ] is the same for me : When you make out to that crotch in the route , take the one that look the shuddery .
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and finish news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
